From: Developing a realistic sexual network model of chlamydia transmission in Britain
Parameter | Best fit or estimated value | Source |
---|---|---|
Behavioural parameters | Â | Â |
Population size (Female = 20,000, Male = 20,000) | 40,000 | - |
Age range in years (uniform distribution) | 16–44 | Natsal 2000 [19] |
Preferred number of concurrent partners | Â | Natsal 2000 [19] |
   <35 years old | 1 or 2 |  |
   35+ years old | 1 |  |
Proportion wanting 2 partners (< 35 years old) | 0.05 | Assumption based on Kretzschmar model [24] |
Mean duration of short partnerships (days) | 14 | Assumption based on Natsal 2000 [19] |
Number of sex acts per day | Â | Assumption based on Kretzschmar model [24] |
   Short partnerships | 1 |  |
   Long partnerships | 0.25 |  |
Mean gap in days between partnerships (dispersion)* | 14 (2) | Assumption |
Infection parameters | Â | Â |
Duration (in days) | Â | Assumption based on Golden [10], Korenromp [30] |
   No treatment seeking | 180 |  |
   Treatment seeking | 30 |  |
Mean refractory period (in days) following treatment (dispersion)* | 7 (10) | Assumption based on CEG guidelines [5] |
Health care parameters | Â | Â |
Attendance rate at health care setting (proportion who report attending a health care setting in the last 12 months) | 0.85 | Chlamydia Recall Study [26,27] |
Treatment efficacy (in those partner notified or screened) | 0.95 | Treatment guidelines [37] |
Mean delay (in days) before partner treatment (dispersion)* | 7 (10) | Assumption based on unpublished Recall study |
Probability of accepting screen | 0.5 | Assumption based on screening studies [38,39] |